summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/resources
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorhorus2022-10-01 04:13:54 +0200
committerhorus2022-10-01 04:13:54 +0200
commitca97a817aa9175ee093cd18510cea7c2cf8f0df5 (patch)
tree5636da515a7435c24c6f21573e70a3da1bd25c35 /resources
parentad6c41809e40992411a9572e83a8db715187bc4c (diff)
downloadcurious-ca97a817aa9175ee093cd18510cea7c2cf8f0df5.tar.gz
wording
Diffstat (limited to 'resources')
-rw-r--r--resources/views/about.blade.php2
1 files changed, 1 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/resources/views/about.blade.php b/resources/views/about.blade.php
index 5634856..7f5c465 100644
--- a/resources/views/about.blade.php
+++ b/resources/views/about.blade.php
@@ -34,7 +34,7 @@ It does so by fetching the <a href="https://news.ycombinator.com">{!! file_get_c
<br>
<br>
-Furthermore, it structures the articles and categorizes them in topics. You can find the respective topics above the article, or <a href="{{ route('topic_index') }}">click here</a> to see all topics alphabetically listed and <a href="{{ route('popular_topics') }}">here to see</a> them sorted by popularity. The topics above the article (those little blue pills) are clickable and link to other articles with the same topic. Those topics are not directly taken from the Wikipedia page itself, but created a different way. And I may be biased, but I find them far more useful than the categories Wikipedia thinks those articles are in.
+Furthermore, it structures the articles and categorizes them in topics. You can find the respective topics above the article, or <a href="{{ route('topic_index') }}">click here</a> to see all topics alphabetically listed and <a href="{{ route('popular_topics') }}">here to see</a> them sorted by popularity. The topics above the article (those little blue pills) are clickable and link to other articles with the same topic. Those topics are not verbatim copied from the Wikipedia page, but created a custom way. And I may be biased, but I find them far more useful than the categories Wikipedia thinks those articles are in. "English poetry in 1751"? Yeah, sure, that's <em>very</em> specific.
<br>
<br>